|
 
Drill Books and Rifles: Part II
by Gus Person
Co. H, 4th U.S. Infantry, Sykes Regulars
February 2004
After Major William J. Hardee’s Rifle and Light Infantry Tactics manual was adopted as
the standard manual for the U.S. Army in 1855, the late 1850s and early 1860s
witnessed the publication of a variety of new manuals written primarily for the
volunteer militia. Foremost among that group was Major
William Gilham’s Manual of Instruction for the
Volunteers and Militia of the United States. Gilham, who was the commandant of cadets at the
Virginia Military Institute in Lexington, Virginia, borrowed liberally from
Scott and Hardee, and also included a section on skirmishing, and chapters on
cavalry and light artillery tactics. His manual was used
extensively by many Confederate units during the Civil War. 1
Elmer
Ellsworth arguably did more than any other individual to promote the military
art in America in the 1850s. His traveling zouave drill team,
headquartered in Chicago, challenged any company, including regulars to the “Military Championship of the United States and Canada.” The
U.S. Zouave Cadets based their drill on Hardee’s Tactics as well as on Winfield Scott’s Infantry Tactics, Captain George McClellan’s translation of the
French bayonet exercise and the U.S. army regulations. Their
drill “Programme” even included a silent drill section 2
Wartime Doctrine
Immediately
after the outbreak of the war in April 1861, the U.S. and Confederate armies
cast about for appropriate drill manuals for their forces. When Hardee resigned
to join the Confederacy, he obviously lost favor
with the Federal government. However, his Tactics
was still applicable, and on 1 May 1861 the United
States Infantry Tactics (two-volumes-in-one)
was adopted as the U.S. standard. The new work was
essentially Hardee’s Tactics with his name conspicuously removed. Immediately after
resigning from the U.S. Army, Hardee accepted a
commission as colonel of the 1st
Regiment Georgia Regulars. That
Spring he entered into a partnership with Mobile, Alabama publisher S.H. Goetzel & Co. to produce an edition of his Tactics for publication in the South. Some changes
were made to make his manual applicable to all infantry, no
matter how armed or organized. Therefore, in this unusual
circumstance, both national armies came to use different editions of the same
manual in the early days of the war. 3
The most
important successor in the Federal service to Hardee’s manual was Brigadier
General Silas Casey’s Infantry Tactics, which was based on the same French source as
Hardee’s and added very little to tactical theory. It was
intended to make the Hardee system widely available in the North without
crediting that system to a soldier who had become a Confederate
general. Casey’s Infantry Tactics was officially adopted by
the U.S. Army on 11 August 1862. At that time, Casey commanded part of the
defenses around Washington D.C., and provided supervision for the camps of
instruction around that locality. Casey’s Infantry Tactics was not an innovative work. It was charged at the time that Casey
had virtually copied all of Hardee’s manual. Casey did, however,
provide a manual of arms for the three-banded rifle-musket, and
his third volume provided instruction for units
up to corps d’armée. 4
Casey’s manual remained the
Federal standard for the rest of the war. However, regardless
of which manual was being used by either army, no system
adequately addressed the problems posed by the range and lethality of the
rifle-musket. Units could deploy faster, and move about the
battlefield much quicker, but when formed in closely-packed columns or lines of
battle, they were still an irresistible target for enemy marksmen. Catastrophic
casualties usually resulted.
No better
example of the inadequacies of the current doctrine used on the Civil War
battlefield could be found than in the experience of the 1st Maine Heavy Artillery Regiment in the Overland
Campaign of 1864. Early in the war, the defenses of
Washington D.C. were manned by a number of heavy artillery units. In the Spring
of 1864, Ulysses S. Grant stripped these units from their
garrison posts to reinforce the Army of the Potomac. With
their red-trimmed frock coats, polished brass and stainless colors, the “Heavies” were quickly made the butt of jokes by the cynical veterans who
regaled the new arrivals with shouts of “Fresh Fish,” “Abe’s Pets!” and “Paper
Collar soldiers!” Now trained and utilized as infantry, and
without the benefit of combat experience, the 1st Maine was thrown into action against Lieutenant
General Richard Ewell’s II Corps Confederate veterans at the battle of Harris
Farm on 19 May 1864 during the battles around Spotsylvania
Courthouse. The regiment, 1200 strong, was committed to the
assault in standard line of battle and ended up losing 476 men, 147 of whom were
killed or mortally wounded. For over an hour they battled
Ewell’s men, back and forth across a series of wooded hollows and
ravines. While the Confederates took advantage of natural
cover and concealment, the “Heavies” conducted a stand-up fight and paid a
bitter price. A month later at Petersburg on 18 June, the
regiment tried the same thing again, and received another severe
drubbing. That afternoon, the Federal commanders initiated a
series on head-on assaults against the Confederate entrenchments. The 1st Maine, aligned in three battalions of four
companies, was designated to spearhead the assault. Their
well-dressed lines surged down a slope and were lashed by musketry and artillery
fire. The onrushing lines were torn to pieces and brought to
a halt before the Confederate rifle pits. Of the 900 men who
commenced the assault, 241 were dead or dying and another 371
wounded. It was another hard lesson to learn. 5
Full
Circle
The year
after the Civil War ended, the army adopted the Model 1866 Springfield rifle,
utilizing the Allin conversion (“trapdoor” breech-loading
mechanism). At the same time, Lieutenant Colonel Emory Upton
(United States Military Academy of 1861) was commissioned to write the new
tactical manual based on the new weapon and incorporating the lessons learned
during the war. Upton had made a name for himself in 1864
during the Spotsylvania battles. On 10 May he was assigned to
lead a force of twelve picked regiments in an assault on the west face of the
Mule Shoe Salient. Upton organized his force in four
lines. Stressing surprise and a speedy assault without
stopping to fire, his storm tactics carried the first and second lines of the
Confederate entrenchments. He was only obliged to withdraw
when the promised reserve division failed to come to his support. For his efforts,
Upton was immediately promoted to the
wartime rank of brigadier general of volunteers by
U
The year
after the Civil War ended, the army adopted the Model 1866 Springfield rifle,
utilizing the Allin conversion (“trapdoor” breech-loading
mechanism). At the same time, Lieutenant Colonel Emory Upton
(United States Military Academy of 1861) was commissioned to write the new
tactical manual based on the new weapon and incorporating the lessons learned
during the war. Upton had made a name for himself in 1864
during the Spotsylvania battles. On 10 May he was assigned to
lead a force of twelve picked regiments in an assault on the west face of the
Mule Shoe Salient. Upton organized his force in four
lines. Stressing surprise and a speedy assault without
stopping to fire, his storm tactics carried the first and second lines of the
Confederate entrenchments. He was only obliged to withdraw
when the promised reserve division failed to come to his support. For
his efforts, Upton was immediately promoted to the
wartime rank of brigadier general of volunteers by U.S. Grant who used the same
tactics two days later with the entire II Army Corps.
After the
war, Upton became known as a military reformer, and certainly his efforts in
writing the new tactical manual gave all the hallmarks of thoughtful
change. Henceforth, the infantry could all fight in
dispersed, skirmish order rather than in the war-time closely-ordered lines of
battle. 6
One wonders
what the casualty rates would have shrunk to had concerned commanders attempted
to correctly correlate their tactics to the weapons at hand from the outset of
the war. But old habits died hard; tradition, false doctrine
and ignorance simply combined to end the lives of too many infantry soldiers on
the battlefields of the Civil War.
1 William Gilham, Manual of Instruction for the Volunteers and Militia
of the United States (Philadelphia, PA: Charles Silver,
1861).
2 Elmer E. Ellsworth, Manual of Arms for the Light
Infantry (1859-60); Dom Dal Bello and Geoff Walden, “Manual of Arms
for Infantry: A Re-Examination,” Camp
Chase Gazette(August 1996), IV:36.
3 Dal
Bello and Walden, “Manual of Arms for Infantry,” I:39,
III:36.
4 Grady McWhiney and Perry
Jamieson, Attack and
Die, Civil War Military Tactics and the Southern Heritage
(Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press, 1982), 54-55;
Silas Casey, Infantry
Tactics Vols. I-III (New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1862).
5 U.S. War Department, The War of the Rebellion: A Compilation
of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies
(Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1880-1901),
Series I, Vol. XL, Part 2, 156-157; Bruce Catton, A Stillness at
Appomattox (New York: The Fairfax Press, 1984), 536; Brian Pohanka,
Don Troiani’s Civil War
(Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books, 1995), 156-158.
6 Emory
Upton, Infantry Tactics
(New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1867).
|