Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bootstrap.php(430) : eval()'d code on line 118
Lorenz.. 2 or 3 band ? - Page 3
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: Lorenz.. 2 or 3 band ?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Union Depot, TN


    Wise words there Andrew.


  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Bedford, Virginia


    So I would guess that the 16th Michigan Volunteers in 1864 will never be done as an impression.
    Boyd Miles

    "Let's go, boys! We've got the d**n Yankees on the run again!" ---Gen. Joseph Wheeler Battle of Las Guasimas, June 24, 1898


  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Columbus, OH


    Stirring the pot, hey, Bill????

    Most reenactors can't afford to buy a Lorenz, an Enfield and a Springfield to allow for proper armament as mentioned for this one original regiment, for example.

    Additionally, we don't always do the exact same unit at every reenactment; scenarios call upon us to be many units at various times, and those who insist upon "being" a single specific unit (whether they were present at that battle or not) do as much a disservice to history as they claim others do.

    So we are left to purchase a single (or occasionally a couple) weapon to fit our needs as we see them and can afford.

    As with many things within this hobby, there is no one always-correct answer; there are just too many variables, and limited funds. So, often we must compromise, preferably in the least offensive way possible.
    Bernard Biederman
    30th OVI
    Co. B

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Rancho San Rafael, Republic of the Pacific


    Buying three rifles wasn't my intent. I could also have mentioned the 10th Texas. Issued Lorenz rifles in '63, but did not have any when they surrendered. They switched to .577/.58. I have seen copies of the ammunition returns, but not the weapons.
    Andrew Grim
    Monte Mounted Rifles, Monte Boys
    Mess of Myself
    Occasional 7%er

    "Los Angeles at the close of the Rebellion was the most vindictive, uncompromising community in the United States" Horace Bell

  5. #25



    Aha! All we need is an authentic reproduction/copy of the M1854 and we are good to go.
    (Or convince a unit of lads to go and restore some originals to their CW era condition/appearance/state... )

    In gleichem Schritt und Tritt, Curt Schmidt

    Not a real Civil War reenactor, I only portray one on boards and fora.
    I do not portray a Civil War soldier, I merely interpret one.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2007


    Curt makes an excellent point. Original M-54s can still be refurbished or "put together" and will make excellent (re)enactor weapons for about the same cost as a de-farbed reproduction and much less than a "custom."

    No one is arguing that US 1861s, 63-4s were not in wide use (en toto). Except more than half of them were not available for issuance in appreciable numbers
    until mid-to-late 1863 and the rest later than that. In contrast, the Union only canceled their P53 contracts in Sept 1863 as it was at that point in time when domestic production was finally able to meet their needs. By then, if my research in British Arms & Accoutrements is close to correct, there were more Enfield rifles in the ranks (both sides) in America than any other single model. The 1861s being distinct from the 1863-4 models. The overall point here is the Enfield "works" for a broader number of scenarios without being out of place or anachronistic than any other single model. Obviously the 1863-4s would be the least versatile, appropriate at late war events only.

    Second, the Armi Sport Enfield repros are no great shakes, but their repro 1861s are much worse and not much can be done about it. The only decent Armi Sport repro is their 1842. This point is beyond serious debate. That leaves Pedersoli as the best choice for a US 1861 or Enfield. The Pedersoli Enfield is about $300 less than their US 1861, works better for a greater variety of scenarios and is less prone to malfunction by design. Hence, the thinking goes "This is kind of a no-brainer." All that said, I almost always use an 1842 because I just plain like it better. I justify my decision making on that point by convincing myself smoothbores are under-represented at most events. The human mind is happy to be deceived and will rationalize things. I would happily use my US 1855 put together, but the National Battlefield Park does not consider it a "reproduction." New Park Superintendent, new rules...or rather stricter enforcement of the existing rules. To me, the repro Enfield is over-represented virtually everywhere precisely for the reasons stated above.
    Last edited by Craig L Barry; 02-14-2013 at 01:11 PM.
    Craig L Barry

    Author: The Civil War Musket: A Handbook for Historical Accuracy

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    King of Prussia, PA


    Quote Originally Posted by flattop32355 View Post
    Stirring the pot, hey, Bill????
    Yeah, I was bored.
    Bill Rodman, If you need a really bad example.
    King of Prussia, PA

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    right behind you reading over your shoulder


    I think there was a wise old owl once who when asked a similar question said, "Three". He may have been talking about something else but it is still the right answer.
    Tom Bramlette

    Glad you asked that question! It is vital to the core of the hobby!
    Fill that rusty canteen with apple cider vinegar, cork it, and leave it in the back of a cool, dark, closet for 16 weeks. That will fix everything.
    Glad to be of service!

    1. All guns are always loaded.
    2. Never point at anything you are not willing to kill.
    3. Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on target.
    4. Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.
    -Jeff Cooper


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts