+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: "Extreme Civil War Reenacting," a review. Part 1 of 2

  1. #31
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Browns Summit, NC
    Posts
    31

    Default good show

    I watched the episode last night(dvr'd it). It was a good episode, interesting. I even saw a few folks that I know.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    20

    Default

    I saw the show. It was unfocused. What I was expecting was a brief background on what reenacting is, interviews of participants talking about why they are spending their leisure time/money on it, entertaining stories about events, and maybe some discussion of the truly hardcore activities. Possibly a discussion of the debate areas.

    What I saw looked like someone followed several reenactors around for a few events, clapped some random footage together, and ran it. Possibly a rush job.

  3. #33

    Default

    Mike OTDP,
    I can assure you that the documentary "Extreme Civil War Reenacting" was FAR from a "rushjob." The production crew from National Geographic was filming as early as April 2011, in Charleston, SC, and they continued to work through the Battle of First Manassas, in July. I know those are facts because I was there, not only to witness their efforts, but also to be part of the filming at five separate locations. I have heard a rumor that the filming --or actually, the videotaping-- continued until August 2011, but I have not confirmed that. Then the National Geographic people went into the "post-production" phases and didn't broadcast the final product until May 2012.
    I won't disagree with you about the rather "unfocused" nature of the final version we saw on our television screens. But there's no question that it wasn't a rushjob. And as I said in my review, I expected far better results from National Geographic.
    Julio
    Julio C. Zangroniz, Independent Photojournalist
    www.zphotos.smugmug.com
    Jzangroniz@comcast.net

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Huntsville
    Posts
    514

    Default

    Gosh, sometimes I think you guys are too hard on yourselves. I only saw the two clips linked above (we don't have cable), but I thought it looked nice. Yeah, such documentaries always show your warts. To me, any time you can have one of these kinds of shows made that don't paint you as a bunch of cooks you've done well. Take pride in your exposure!

    Sorry about your cutting-room floor disappearance, though! I had the same thing - the History Channel flew me up to Worcester, Mass. to do a segment on History vs. Hollywood for the movie "Kingdom of Heaven". There is about 5 segments of video and 20 seconds of voice for the effort.

    Steve
    Steve Sheldon

  5. #35

    Default

    Mr. Sheldon,
    I know how the "Hollywood Set" has to work, and I'm more or less resigned to it. That doesn't mean I like it. I don't.
    But after something like 26-32 "on-camera" HOURS, I was truly disappointed to be left out of the final product completely. Actually, not completely, since the producers were "kind enough" to include my name in the "thanks to" list at the end of the documentary.
    Nevertheless, it will be a cold day in H*ll before I agree to cooperate with another filmmaker about Civil War reenacting.
    Because I still feel "used and abused" by this particular group. In addition to filming/interviewing me at four events in four different states where I was attempting to cover the reenactments for publication, the National Geographic folks took an entire day out of my life when I agreed to let them come to my HOME and film me in two primitive camps I had set up in my backyard, at my built-in firepit, in my garage, in my basement, etc. etc. etc. The only place they DIDN'T film me was when I went to the bathroom. And that's because I was careful enough to lock the door behind me!
    While at my house, they even "borrowed" 4-5 books from my personal Civil War bookshelves --tomes that they haven't returned YET (end of July, as I write), even though their final production was broadcast way back in May, nearly three months ago. I'm seriously considering sending the producer an invoice for 5-6 times the original cost of those books, because most of them are "out of print" now and it is bound to become a more "pricey" endeavor to secure duplicates.
    As far as I'm concerned, others --anyone else-- can have all the glory.
    I am DONE with Hollywood.
    Julio
    Julio C. Zangroniz, Independent Photojournalist
    www.zphotos.smugmug.com
    Jzangroniz@comcast.net

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Huntsville
    Posts
    514

    Default

    Like I said, Julio, I can understand not being happy with all the effort going unused.

    I was just talking about the quality of the video clips. I think they gave a good showing of what you guys do. It looked very cool to me.

    That is all.

    Steve
    Steve Sheldon

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,298

    Default

    Extreme Reenacting would be, IMHO, putting on an event.



    Pards,
    S. Chris Anders
    Southern Division
    www.southerndivision.org
    www.rearrank.com
    www.marylandmymaryland.org

    There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things. - Niccoló Machiavelli, The Prince. 1537.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts