+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Leather Neck Stock

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    110

    Default Leather Neck Stock

    Hey
    How common were Leather Neck Stocks. I know they were part of a dress uniform and to stop sabers blows. Were they issued to all troops? I dont see them in many origional photos. One of which is General Sheremn wearing one.

    General Sherman
    http://s259.photobucket.com/albums/h...nt=sherman.jpg

    Picture from Dells Leather Works Leather Sock Item.
    Nic Gunning
    Mifflin Guard
    61st New York Infantry

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,237

    Default

    Hard to say exactly how common, but the government acquired 745,814 over the course of the war (ORs, Series III, Vol. 5, p. 285).

    Or these, 386,952 remained in storage at the end of the war (ibid, p. 278 ).

    This still indicates that more than 350,000 leather stocks were issued to the troops, or about one to every nine enlistments, or one to about every six men who served.

    They cost 14 cents in '61, 10 cents in '62, 9 cents in '63, and 12 cents in '64-65.

    They may have been pointless, uncomfortable, and wasteful, but a lot of them got issued. It seems to me that any regiment that spent a lot of time in garrison might have been expected to have them.
    M. A. Schaffner
    Midstream Regressive Complainer

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pvt Schnapps
    more than 350,000 leather stocks were issued to the troops, or about one to every nine enlistments, or one to about every six men who served.
    Pointless, uncomfortable, and wasteful don't begin to cover it. And the fact that not even half of those ordered ended up being issued should tell you how much emphasis the Army placed on that particular item ... I feel safe in saying that every one issued ended up disappearing or being used for something practical like cone proectors, which the Regulations also required every soldier to have.
    Darrell Cochran
    Third U.S. Regular Infantry
    http://www.buffsticks.us

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Borden-Carleton, PEI Canada
    Posts
    162

    Default

    Nick, I am by no means an expert on this item and may well be going out on a limb here but that picture does not look like a neck stock to me. It appears to be a neck scarf. Neck stocks, as worn by British Redcoats in the Napoleanic era were high, tight collars of stiff leather. Their purpose was to cause the soldier to have a proper "military posture, ie: head high, not turning about". These items were so high and tight that they constantly left red marks from chafing on the soldiers necks. This is only part of the reason they were so detested. In addition, they were only worn by the common soldier. Never was there an officer that wore one. I have no imformation on their construction or us in the ACW period but thought I would give you what little info I had on prior period neck stocks. Hope it sheds a little light.
    Bernie Kiggins
    ---------------------------------------
    The Edney Greys, Co. A, 25th NCT
    14th Iowa US
    ---------------------------------------
    The Prince Edward Island Regiment (RCAC)

    "Battles are won by slaughter and maneuver. The greater the general, the more he contributes in maneuver, the less he demands in slaughter."
    - Winston Churchill

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,237

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Regular3
    Pointless, uncomfortable, and wasteful don't begin to cover it. And the fact that not even half of those ordered ended up being issued should tell you how much emphasis the Army placed on that particular item ... I feel safe in saying that every one issued ended up disappearing or being used for something practical like cone proectors, which the Regulations also required every soldier to have.
    What amazed me was how many they actually bought!

    But I could see them getting some use among the regiments garrisoning Washington. The 34th Massachusetts sprang for white gloves from their regimental fund, and there were a fair amount of equally useless shoulder scales produced as well.

    Say, wasn't the 3rd US camped in Franklin Square for a while?

    You just don't want anyone asking you where yours is, do you?
    M. A. Schaffner
    Midstream Regressive Complainer

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pvt Schnapps
    What amazed me was how many they actually bought!

    But I could see them getting some use among the regiments garrisoning Washington. The 34th Massachusetts sprang for white gloves from their regimental fund, and there were a fair amount of equally useless shoulder scales produced as well.

    Say, wasn't the 3rd US camped in Franklin Square for a while?

    You just don't want anyone asking you where yours is, do you?
    Hmm ... The Third may have been camped in what is now Franklin Square at some point. I do know that they spent the spring of 1861 in the area now occupied by George Washington University (and again after Bull Run), moved across the river on July 4 and made a new camp roughly where the southeast corner of Arlington Cemetery now lies. When they came back to the city in October 1864 after spending the spring & summer in Washington Square in New York City, they were camped somewhere along 7th Street.

    Feel free to ask me where my stock is -- As you pointed out, they cost 14 cents in '61, 10 cents in '62, 9 cents in '63, and 12 cents in '64-65 ... So, at the rate of two per enlistment, by a rough calculation I'd pay a total of not more than about 25 cents in fines for "losing" them -- Not a bad tradeoff

    We do have a few members who have them, and our First Sgt. has even been known to wear his on occasion. Bully for him, I say.
    Darrell Cochran
    Third U.S. Regular Infantry
    http://www.buffsticks.us

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    318

    Default

    Gosh, I still have MY neck stock from when I was in the regulars! What's the army coming to these days?
    Scott Washburn
    Mifflin Guard
    www.paperterrain.com

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ScottWashburn
    Gosh, I still have MY neck stock from when I was in the regulars! What's the army coming to these days?
    Scott, As the War wears on and casualty figures rise, and with states offering outrageous bounties, it's hard enough to convince young men to sign away 3 years of their lives in the Regulars without scaring them by encasing their necks in dog collars.
    Darrell Cochran
    Third U.S. Regular Infantry
    http://www.buffsticks.us

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Fort Wayne-ish
    Posts
    208

    Default

    Heck, I know where mine is; it goes on every time my scales go on. Actually, I find that one you get used to it being there you forget its on until someone looks at you funny. Maybe I'm just a masochist though...
    Scott McGowan
    Wearer Of Many Hats
    35th OVI, Co G
    19th U.S. Infantry 1st Bat. Co. A
    Past Master, Lebanon #26 F&AM

    Mar. 9, 1863 Whiskey issued - all the boys drunk - an awful time in camp - frightening - whiskey is a bad thing.

    R. H. Foord, Sgt. Later 1st Lt.
    35th OVI, Co. K

    www.ovcwa.com
    www.19thusregulars.com

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Im shure the soldiers just would throw them away if they did not want them. You do not see them in many photos. The whole point is I just wanted to know if they were issued to everyone/how many were issued. Thanks

    Nick
    Nic Gunning
    Mifflin Guard
    61st New York Infantry

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts