PDA

View Full Version : In Support of Colonel Markijohn....



littleforkranger
01-04-2009, 01:07 PM
After hearing criticisms of Colonel Markijohn, commanding the Federal Cavalry at the June 2008 fighting along the Rappahannock River at Brandy Station I find they have no merit.

Having been involved with the Colonel before, during, and after the event, I can attest to this. No one worker harder than Colonel Markijohn to ensure that mounts and troopers under his command were taken care of. Having to operate in an oven proved insurmountable, forcing decisions that were difficult and disappointing. For example, the Federals were scheduled to ride in 23 miles, complete with horse drawn artillery and ammunition train. This decision was changed in the midst of 100?? degrees and wisely amended to a shorter version, about 11 miles. This route proved unpassable at several areas due to fallen trees from a tremendous tornado 19 hours prior. At several points along the march a path had to be hacked out of the wilderness to allow passage of the gun. I cannot imagine the horrors of this march, I was with the Confederates on a shorter version of our scheduled ride. Throughout the day the temperature rose to 107. The heat index was 115. I was at the Federal Camp when they returned and I can tell you you've never seen a more authentic, worn out detachment of Yankees ride by. These men and horses were wore to a frazzle. Yet they rose the next day, man and beast, and fought the attacking Rebels to a standstill. It was with intense pride and relief, that at 2200 hours I watched the last of these splendid fellows march into their camps. We huzzahed them like heroes.

As I stated previously, I was present when many of these hard problems/decisions were being considered and Colonel Markijohn demonstrated coolness, deliberation, and good sense throughout. His concern for his men and horses was apparent and considered carefully throughout this process. He was also blessed with a great staff of hard workers. Did he push folks, challenge them, ask much of, YES. But this very mettle is necessary to lead troops, too long the faint of heart have feebly portrayed officers in this man's army. About midnight after the ride-in, and when man and horse (except the pickets) were all sleeping like the dead, a lone man walked into my camp and up to the fire. It was Colonel Markijohn coming from the picket lines where he had been checking all the horses.

You make the call......

Poor Private
01-04-2009, 01:54 PM
This thread is in response to what?? Or connected to what? It seems to spring out of thin air, with no explaination to why it's here, it left me with cocked eyebrows. Anyone else know?

FloridaConfederate
01-04-2009, 02:22 PM
No matter how good a man is, I can't seem to get past the ubiquitous heart shaped martingale.

The jack chain of the cavalry.

The barometer of equine win / fail.

Chris Rideout
Tampa, FLorida

Radar
01-04-2009, 05:07 PM
:confused:
This thread is in response to what?? Or connected to what? It seems to spring out of thin air, with no explaination to why it's here, it left me with cocked eyebrows. Anyone else know?

AND it refers to an event six months ago. What's the meaning of this post???

tompritchett
01-05-2009, 12:51 AM
This thread is in response to what??

I am assuming that it is a response to the following thread:
http://www.cwreenactors.com/forum/showthread.php?t=9380&highlight=Brandy+Station
which ran in late June and early July of 2008. As to why this post is just being made new, I would just hazard a guess that the poster is someone that had been inactive on the forum for a while and decided to return after learning of the thread, probably at a unit annual meeting.

littleforkranger
01-05-2009, 12:58 AM
:confused:

AND it refers to an event six months ago. What's the meaning of this post???

This is an attempt to respond to a lot of undue criticism of a good re-enactor officer who poured a ton of sweat into an honest attempt to conduct a good cavalry event. Many of his detractors, and supporters as well, frequent this board, it provides a vehicle to respond to unfair and untrue allegations. I know of no other. I'll apologize if it offends anyone's sensibilities, my only intent was to set the record straight.

I will reiterate the point that it is anathema to the hobby to unfairly criticize gentlemen who sincerely try to conduct good events.....

Ross L. Lamoreaux
01-05-2009, 01:19 AM
We are all asking, "what undue criticism?", as I've found nothing on this forum that mentions any issues with the man, other than the above mention. The original posting on Brandy Station mentioned no individuals, just that overall the event was full of issues, again nobody blamed by name or mention. Unless the colonel was responsible for alot of bad individual impressions as described in the rant from a few months ago, there are a few of us who are out of this loop and not really knowing. This latest post is just confusing when no pubilc issues have been raised about the colonel in question.

littleforkranger
01-05-2009, 01:25 AM
I am assuming that it is a response to the following thread:
http://www.cwreenactors.com/forum/showthread.php?t=9380&highlight=Brandy+Station
which ran in late June and early July of 2008. As to why this post is just being made new, I would just hazard a guess that the poster is someone that had been inactive on the forum for a while and decided to return after learning of the thread, probably at a unit annual meeting.

Tom,
I was aware of the post early on, but I stopped reading Mr. Kern's posts several years ago when, in my opinion, the venom outweighed the history. I felt it improper to participate in the thread without reading the starting post.

My reaction was solely from comments assembled from various events attended from June thru November 2008 and were only intended to address Colonel Markijohn's handling of an extreme situation. Although most of those criticisms weren't posted on this forum, as I've stated, many of those fellows frequent this board. Sorry if this caused an upset, it's not my intention....please close this if you feel it is prudent....

billwatson2
01-05-2009, 07:39 PM
"We are all asking, "what undue criticism?", "

I believe he answered, and it's insightful: He's using this forum to respond to criticisms taking place in the reenacting community.

That's a good thing. It's exactly what Scot Buffington would like to do with the Cedar Creek scenario botching, drag whatever happened out of the shadows and campfire bitch sessions and have a factfinding. Odds are that one won't turn out so well for whoever was in charge, but the idea that a public presentation of facts, rather than opinions, and rather than perhaps self-serving murmurings from the shadows, will show everyone the truth is pretty basic. We've all seen the whisper campaigns and the rot they spread. Exposure to sunlight is a good disinfectant.

Of course I would think that, being the editor of a newspaper, but still... :-)